<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;The Bachelor&#8221; couple may have to return $50,000 Chopard Ring!</title>
	<link>http://www.jrdunnblog.com/2007/09/05/the-bachelor-couple-may-have-to-return-50000-chopard-ring/</link>
	<description>Latest Jewelry Trends and Celebrity Jewelry Style &#124; Get your Fix Now at the J.R.Dunn Blog!</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 19:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Delphine</title>
		<link>http://www.jrdunnblog.com/2007/09/05/the-bachelor-couple-may-have-to-return-50000-chopard-ring/#comment-108</link>
		<author>Delphine</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 00:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.jrdunnblog.com/2007/09/05/the-bachelor-couple-may-have-to-return-50000-chopard-ring/#comment-108</guid>
		<description>I totally agree with you that they have their priorities straight, BUT I think it's a big part of the show that it should be people who are really looking to be married.  I didn't watch this season but it just seems like these women are giving a lot of themselves sometimes while the guy gets to choose from his harem with no expectation of marriage.  I don't know about this season as I didn't watch, as I stated before, but that's how it seems to me.  

-Delphine</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with you that they have their priorities straight, BUT I think it&#8217;s a big part of the show that it should be people who are really looking to be married.  I didn&#8217;t watch this season but it just seems like these women are giving a lot of themselves sometimes while the guy gets to choose from his harem with no expectation of marriage.  I don&#8217;t know about this season as I didn&#8217;t watch, as I stated before, but that&#8217;s how it seems to me.  </p>
<p>-Delphine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
